Current:Home > Back$70,000 engagement ring must be returned after canceled wedding, Massachusetts high court rules-InfoLens
$70,000 engagement ring must be returned after canceled wedding, Massachusetts high court rules
View
Date:2024-12-23 11:17:11
BOSTON (AP) — Who gets to keep an engagement ring if a romance turns sour and the wedding is called off?
That’s what the highest court in Massachusetts was asked to decide with a $70,000 ring at the center of the dispute.
The court ultimately ruled Friday that an engagement ring must be returned to the person who purchased it, ending a six-decade state rule that required judges to try to identify who was to blame for the end of the relationship.
The case involved Bruce Johnson and Caroline Settino, who started dating in the summer of 2016, according to court filings. Over the next year, they traveled together, visiting New York, Bar Harbor, Maine, the Virgin Islands and Italy. Johnson paid for the vacations and also gave Settino jewelry, clothing, shoes and handbags.
Eventually, Johnson bought a $70,000 diamond engagement ring and in August 2017 asked Settino’s father for permission to marry her. Two months later, he also bought two wedding bands for about $3,700.
Johnson said he felt like after that Settino became increasingly critical and unsupportive, including berating him and not accompanying him to treatments when he was diagnosed with prostate cancer, according to court filings.
At some point Johnson looked at Settino’s cell phone and discovered a message from her to a man he didn’t know.
“My Bruce is going to be in Connecticut for three days. I need some playtime,” the message read. He also found messages from the man, including a voicemail in which the man referred to Settino as “cupcake” and said they didn’t see enough of each other. Settino has said the man was just a friend.
Johnson ended the engagement. But ownership of the ring remained up in the air.
A trial judge initially concluded Settino was entitled to keep the engagement ring, reasoning that Johnson “mistakenly thought Settino was cheating on him and called off the engagement.” An appeals court found Johnson should get the ring.
In September, the case landed before the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, which ultimately ruled that Johnson should keep the ring.
In their ruling the justices said the case raised the question of whether the issue of “who is at fault” should continue to govern the rights to engagement rings when the wedding doesn’t happen.
More than six decades ago, the court found that an engagement ring is generally understood to be a conditional gift and determined that the person who gives it can get it back after a failed engagement, but only if that person was “without fault.”
“We now join the modern trend adopted by the majority of jurisdictions that have considered the issue and retire the concept of fault in this context,” the justices wrote in Friday’s ruling. “Where, as here, the planned wedding does not ensue and the engagement is ended, the engagement ring must be returned to the donor regardless of fault.”
Johnson’s lawyer, Stephanie Taverna Siden, welcomed the ruling.
“We are very pleased with the court’s decision today. It is a well-reasoned, fair and just decision and moves Massachusetts law in the right direction,” Siden said.
A lawyer for Settino did not immediately respond to an email seeking comment.
veryGood! (43)
Related
- Florida State can't afford to fire Mike Norvell -- and can't afford to keep him
- Tesla recalls 1.85 million vehicles over hood latch issue that could increase risk of crash
- When does Simone Biles compete next? Olympics gymnastics schedule for all-around final
- Norah O'Donnell to step away as 'CBS Evening News' anchor this year
- 'Joker 2' actor pans DC sequel as the 'worst film' ever: 'It has no plot'
- Olympic gymnastics live updates: Simone Biles, USA win gold medal in team final
- USA men's 4x200 relay races to silver to cap night of 4 medals
- Norah O'Donnell to step away as 'CBS Evening News' anchor this year
- Louisiana asks court to block part of ruling against Ten Commandments in classrooms
- 2024 Olympics: Team USA Wins Gold at Women’s Gymnastics Final
Ranking
- Gun groups sue to overturn Maine’s new three-day waiting period to buy firearms
- Inmate advocates describe suffocating heat in Texas prisons as they plea for air conditioning
- Barbie launches 'Dream Besties,' dolls that have goals like owning a tech company
- Wildfire doubles in Colorado’s Rocky Mountains as evacuations continue
- Oprah Winfrey Addresses Claim She Was Paid $1 Million by Kamala Harris' Campaign
- Families seek answers after inmates’ bodies returned without internal organs
- Olympic gymnastics live updates: Simone Biles, USA win gold medal in team final
- Jodie Sweetin defends Olympics amid Last Supper controversy, Candace Cameron critiques
Recommendation
Mike Tyson has lived a wild life. These 10 big moments have defined his career
Arizona voters to decide congressional primaries, fate of metro Phoenix election official
Court holds up Biden administration rule on airline fees while the carriers sue to kill it
Man shot and killed in ambush outside Philadelphia mosque, police say
Sister Wives’ Madison Brush Details Why She Went “No Contact” With Dad Kody Brown
DJ Moore signs 4-year, $110 million extension with Chicago Bears
The Bachelor's Hailey Merkt Dead at 31 After Cancer Battle
Powerball winning numbers for July 29 drawing: Jackpot rises to $154 million